There was that report from Odin about UHF versus HF for Pharma SCM and ePedigree. One important note is how the conclusions were based on their comparison of E-field UHF with H-field HF.

And there have been several other recent op eds and articles [pdf] that further explain some of the issues important to this *war*.

I think the discussion (thankfully) is starting to expand to include other factors that are equally as important as frequency. Namely, some of these articles and reports are starting to discuss "coupling".

Finally, the industry is starting to understand that coupling, the wireless but physical connection between tag and reader, is independent of frequency.Coupling is something the industry is only starting to recognize as a key RFID systems level consideration. Here are a few terms to keep straight for these two basic types of coupling:

Electric field coupling, E-Field, Capacitive Coupling, Far-Field, Dipole antenna, Magnetic field coupling, H-Field, Inductive Coupling, Near-Field, Loop antenna

As a long time technical expert, I started SkyeTek already with several years experience making E-field tags and readers at both LF and HF – I think before Matrics and Alien were sampling their first UHF tag silicon.Now there appears to be a reverse opportunity for making inductive coupling tags with UHF tag silicon.The promise is to solve some remaining problems with UHF item level tagging, and to further drive the economy of scale for Gen2.

Indeed, SkyeTek applauds some of the new tag product announcements and the flurry of reader, antenna, and installation development that will necessarily follow to provide among other things - UHF item level tagging.

The result is that more products, systems and applications than ever will become RFID-enabled.

Until now the industry has focused more on the differences than the similarities between HF and UHF.Now that's starting to change as awareness continues to grow. SkyeTek is a neutral party because we provide Tagnostic(R) HF and UHF RFID reader technologies that easily configure for use with either type of coupling. Because we don't prefer either frequency HF or UHF, we can provide the best solution for our customers, instead of looking to force our solution on the world.